Subject: Re: War path against 1P
From: Loretta Wheeler (lw@condomanagement.com)
Date: Fri Oct 28 2005 - 18:42:33 CDT
Do not misunderstand my first E-mail. I am not saying that security is 100%
in the building. All I am saying is I changed the keys when they were
stolen so the person would not get back into the building with the keys.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Thomas" <jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu>
To: <vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: War path against 1P
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 thelen8830@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I am in unit 410 and I also have been attempting to reach Lorreta who
>> does not return calls. I was also locked out. My new keys were mailed
>> out on the 21 0ct 2005 which was three days before they were changed.
>> No notice at all. I also had a problem with my last set of keys. I had
>> heard that the locks were going to be changed and saw lorreta in the
>> building. When I approached her and asked her where my keys where she
>> aid that she had given them to my tenants. I DONT HAVE ANY TENANTS. I
>> think it is time for a change and i am not talking about "LOCKS".
>
> Then it's worse than I thought.
>
> This is compounded by a data point I haven't mentioned. In private email
> to Loretta, when the locks were first changed, I suggested that it would
> maybe wise if we were given a few extra days notice when locks would be
> changed so that, if we were out of town, we could make arrangements to
> get the new key, or if we came back to town late (as we did tonight), we
> wouldn't be standing in the cold trying to figure out what happened. Her
> response basically pooh-poohed this, suggesting that sometimes,
> inconveniences for some are inevitable.
>
> So how does she respond next?
>
> We WERE NOT notified of a second change in locks by postal mail, email,
> phone! It's incomprehensible that, if locks were to be changed on Oct 24,
> keys would be sent out on Oct 21. If true, and after the back-forth we've
> had in the past 2 weeks about the need for communication, this is so
> stunningly incompetent that whoever is responsible for this should be
> terminated. What is going through the heads of these folks to think that
> mailing keys to people on oct 21 is sufficient time??
>
> Michael, Loretta, don't you think that maybe, just maybe, you folk have
> a bit more than just a "communication issue" that you might begin
> addressing?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Thomas / Department of Sociology / Northern Illinois University
> jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu / http://www.soci.niu.edu/~jthomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 19 2006 - 16:56:08 CST