Subject: Re: Hallway Paint
From: Michele Tittle (micheletittle@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri Nov 04 2005 - 05:53:17 CST
Ditto.
I have not met one resident in the building who is happy with the color
choices, it is just so disappointing that we pay all this money and this is
what we get in return. Turquoise halls. Painted badly. They are all ready
scratched up, not to mention painted sloppily, most likely because they
didn't use the appropriate type of paint for such heavily trafficked area.
Michele #701
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ric" <xrev68x@yahoo.com>
To: <vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:46 AM
Subject: Hallway Paint
>
> I'm not going to jump on board with the Loreta
> bashing, because she's gone out of her way to get back
> to me on phone calls, however, I am going to jump on
> board with the paint color bashing.
>
> Not having been in the building for several months,
> seeing the 'new' paint turned my stomach. Tacky may
> not be the right word to use, but I definitely don't
> like it whatever it is.
>
> I am curious as to how the new colors were chosen. I
> understand not everyone is going to have the same
> tastes, but when you are talking about a 99 unit
> building, maybe less 'risky' of colors should have
> been chosen.
>
> Ric
>
> --- Thelen8830@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I have been calling Loreta for over a week, in
> > regards to lack of notice in
> > changing locks. I have called Loreta over 5 times
> > with no return phone
> > calls. Why are we paying 1P so much money and i
> > cant even get a simple answer. I
> > notice that they always find away to get me my bill
> > and raise my assesment
> > with out raising the quality of work done at our
> > building. By the way when
> > did a bark blue strip ever look good in the middle
> > of two types of browns. Who
> > is the color bling individual who picked this out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 19 2006 - 16:56:08 CST