Re: Vanguard Lofts - Visitor Parking


Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Visitor Parking
From: Michael E. Rutkowski (mr@condomanagement.com)
Date: Mon Nov 21 2005 - 13:06:49 CST


I think the memo under everyone's door counts as attempting to track down the owner...we're not the police and can't look up license plate numbers (and we don't have that plate number on anyone's Master Owner Information Sheet). Loretta will have Julio put a sticker on the car, but after the memo, I just figured that was overkill.

Michael E. Rutkowski
Principal
First Properties, LLC
Phone: 312.829.8900
Fax: 312.829.8950
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: christian.a.lattimer@jpmchase.com
  To: vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu
  Cc: lw@condomanagement.com ; Michael E. Rutkowski ; vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu ; vanguard-talk-bounce@venus.soci.niu.edu
  Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:01 PM
  Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Visitor Parking

  I agree, towing should be done only as a last resort, and after sufficient attempts to contact the owner have occurred. Question... is property management making attempts to track down the owner of this vehicle? As of 8:45am this morning the vehicle was still in the lot... is First Properties going to tag the vehicle with a sticker?

  Thanks for your reply Jim.

  - Chris

  Christian A Lattimer Jim Thomas <jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu>
        Sent by: vanguard-talk-bounce@venus.soci.niu.edu
        11/21/2005 11:11 AM
        Please respond to vanguard-talk
               
                To: vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu
                cc: "Michael E. Rutkowski" <mr@condomanagement.com>, lw@condomanagement.com
                Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Visitor Parking

> As of 8:45 this morning, the silver Audi A6 4-door (Plate Number: WI
> 355-DLD) is still in the visitor parking lot. The car has been in the lot
> for over 72 hours without moving. It is time to tow this vehicle and have
> it removed.

  Normally, towing should be done only as a last resort, and after
  sufficient attempts to contact the owner have occured. Although we've
  discussed this on the list, it's possible the owner isn't subbed (although
  about 2/3s of the units are subbed). However, 1P distributed the blurb
  about visitor parking under the doors and, as of yesterday, there was
  what appeared to be a warning note on the windshield of the Audi.
  Also, the condo docs are clear: Visitor parking isn't for long-term
  storage of vehicles.

  That said, I'd opt for giving the owner a few more days in case they are
  out of town or there is some other mitigating issue. This would be the
  first time we've responded to parking abuse, so erring on the side of
  caution might be a bit more neighborly, even in the face of the
  unneighborly in-your-face abuse by the owner.

  Perhaps somebody could put a new note under the Audi's windshield (or tape
  it instead) giving until Weds.

  Then, at the next board meeting, we develop a written set of enforcment
  rules specifying the policy and indicating the criteria that trigger
  towing. I don't have the condo docs at hand, but as I recall, there is
  a provision that allows for longer visitor parking with permission
  (ie, out of town guests who are staying for a week or more).

  I share Chris's anger and frustration, and my emotional side would like
  to see the hammer come down. But, the social justice side of me tempers
  that with an attempt to "rehabilitate," keep things fair--even if it
  costs us some time--and try to educate wayward neighbors about their
  responsibilities.

  Jim

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Jim Thomas / Department of Sociology / Northern Illinois University
    jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu / http://www.soci.niu.edu/~jthomas



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 19 2006 - 16:56:09 CST