Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Furnace/Heat Issues
From: Kelly Cacioppo  (kellymcacioppo@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 30 2009 - 15:55:45 CST
Sorry to send the same request, but can I please have certified's number as well? My husband just got home and called to tell me that it's freezing in our place and that our heat isn't working.  Add unit # 708 to the list.  Thanks!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Joy Ringger <ringger@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:50:17 
To: <vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu>
Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Furnace/Heat Issues
my issue was the same as Ian's.  Certified thought it was the vents on  
 the roof and only charged me $38 to reset my furnace.  How do I send a  
 copy of the receipt to the board?
 joy
 
 On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Christian A Lattimer wrote:
 
 >
 > Thanks Ian.  Please hold onto the receipt from your service call.   
 > This is verification that your unit was inspected by a professional  
 > and you had a potential problem with a vent stack.  Send a copy to  
 > the condo board and property management along with a quick note of  
 > the company that serviced your unit.  We can get in touch with the  
 > company and get them access to the roof.
 >
 > Over the years many of the vent stacks on the roof have been  
 > extended to address issues like this.
 >
 > Glad everything is working now.  $38 was an inexpensive fix.  I'm  
 > sure others would like to use the same company for that price.
 >
 > - Chris
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: vanguard-talk-bounce@venus.soci.niu.edu [mailto:vanguard-talk-bounce@venus.soci.niu.edu <mailto:vanguard-talk-bounce@venus.soci.niu.edu>  
 > ] On Behalf Of IAN L HEPBURN
 > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 11:16 AM
 > To: vanguard-talk@venus.soci.niu.edu
 > Subject: Re: Vanguard Lofts - Furnace/Heat Issues
 >
 >
 > I had them out last night after they fixed Jay's unit and someone  
 > elses.
 >
 > The gentleman seems to think that the problem has to do with the vent
 > on the roof which causes a downdraft and causes the units to
 > overheat.  He feels that not all the units are affected, only the ones
 > with shorter vents.  This was not a problem when the units were newer.
 > Anyway, he adjusted the output (don't ask me what that is) and mine
 > has worked fine since he made the adjustments and only charged me $38
 > for a service call.  He knew what he was doing.
 >
 > Sent from my iPhone
 >
 > On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Christian A Lattimer <christian.a.lattimer@jpmchase.com
 >> wrote:
 >
 >>
 >> I've been monitoring the communications to determine if there is a
 >> pattern that would indicate a large scale problem.  So far there
 >> isn't much of a pattern... thus indicating isolated incidents.  The
 >> following units have reported problems with their furnace not
 >> working properly.
 >>
 >> 507     Hepburn, Ian
 >> 508     Wolf, Jason
 >> 602     Magallanes, Leticia
 >> 603     Ringger, Joy
 >> 613     Chapmon, Evelyn
 >> 702     Shereyk, Ronald
 >> 703     Elakkatt, Shiju
 >> 714     Winston-Hatch, Kimberly J.
 >> 713     Raffel, Robin
 >>
 >> Please keep in mind all vertical units share a common vent stack, so
 >> if there is a large scale problem that needs to be addressed,
 >> chances are multiple units in a vertical stack will experience the
 >> same problem.
 >>
 >> Units on the 5th floor reporting problems are on the east side of
 >> the building and the units above and below have not reported any
 >> issues.
 >>
 >> Units on the 6th and 7th floor experiencing problems are the *02 and
 >> *03 vertical stacks, and the *13 vertical stacks.  Again, no issues
 >> have been reported on the lower floors or many of the adjacent units.
 >>
 >> The only issue that would be a "building related" issue would be the
 >> vent stack on the roof.  If there is a problem with a vertical vent
 >> stack not functioning properly, this is something the condo board
 >> and property management will address.
 >>
 >> All problems with a furnace inside a unit are considered "owner
 >> issues" and need to be addressed by the owner of the unit.  (Oh, the
 >> joy of being a home owner.)
 >>
 >> As Jason has stated in a previous email, the age of the furnace in
 >> your unit is close to 11 years old by now.  If you have only had
 >> basic furnace maintenance for the past 11 years, chances are some of
 >> the components are near end of life and have less tolerance, thus
 >> shutting down the furnace in your unit.
 >>
 >> If you have an HVAC specialist out to your unit, and they report the
 >> problem to be an issue with the vent stack on the roof of the
 >> building, please report the issue to the condo board and property
 >> management.  Send us the documentation of your service call and we
 >> will investigate the issue and have it resolved.
 >>
 >> At the moment, there is nothing to indicate a vent stack problem.
 >> All we have is reports of owner maintained furnace equipment not
 >> functioning properly.  The furnace equipment in these units could be
 >> failing for a variety of reasons.
 >>
 >> If your furnace is not working, it is best that you have a certified
 >> professional inspect your furnace and make the necessary repairs.
 >>
 >> Best regards,
 >> Chris
 >> This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not
 >> intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of
 >> any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any
 >> transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not
 >> warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change
 >> without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not
 >> necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries
 >> and affiliates.
 >>
 >> This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
 >> confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
 >> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you
 >> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
 >> use of the information contained herein (including any reliance
 >> thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any
 >> attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
 >> that might affect any computer system into which it is received and
 >> opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it
 >> is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase &
 >> Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss
 >> or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this
 >> transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and
 >> destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard
 >> copy format. Thank you.
 >>
 >> Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures <http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures>  for
 >> disclosures relating to European legal entities.
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun May 16 2010 - 15:06:38 CDT